Hi, interesting one...
Quick true story, my dad was a traffic policeman, he told me once about how he got put on report for not arresting enough people. The senior officer took this as an indication that he wasn't doing his job, being too soft on people. He accepted that he hardly ever arrested anyone, but also contended that accidents had dropped by x% on his stretch of road and they had much less problems with road contractors and hauliers because he would stop and have a chat and people responded to that.
A lot of skills do transfer well from business to church and finances, looking after the fabric etc. should be done in a professional manner. I think it is where results are concerned though that care is needed. Tools such as KPIs are very useful but should be chosen really carefully, returning regularly to the mission statement to make sure you are not wandering away from the church's raison d'etre. Measuring results is a part of good governance but shouldn't be pursued for its own end.
My main concern with KPIs is that somethings are much easier to quantify than others. It's human nature to measure the things that are easy and give equal emphasis to all, when what we should look at are things that are meaningful, like the amount the congregation feels included and belonging, how interesting and fulfilling they find services, how accessible the church is to others, how effective outreach and pastoral care is, what the community feels about the church, how effctively it relates to other denominations....like you say, just counting the number of bums on seats doesn't tell you much at all.
I don't know what various churches are required to report to their denomination .. it could be that policy and reporting is driving churchs' focus in the same way that SATs results do for schools and aiting lists times do for health care trusts.
Fran
